Sunday, September 4, 2011

What the Google Panda Update, And Change In SEO?

I read lots of articles and blog posts about recent changes to Google SEO Panda did. I felt completely kill sites, dinging a reputable article directories, delete the results of a large retailer, you name it, if you dinged, it's a panda. Panda, but the game does not change SEO? I do not think so.

Google Updater Panda Ding has a lot of places, but the main goal of updating seems to be to get rid of the contents of farm. If you are not familiar with the contents of a farm, it is essentially a constant stream of posts and articles (or a copy) that exist simply to put more content on a Web Design page wants to focus on keywords and attract backlinks and re pingbacks messages. You may have a team of directors who could write hundreds of articles and post them to improve their unsatisfactory engine optimization research. It worked, at least for a while.

Some big-name companies have also been involved in the content of the farm system - look what happened to JC Penney. Together with a simple upgrade, Google has taken what had worked and worked surprisingly well for months. During this time the content is king - that more is better - no matter where it comes from or how well it was written, the contents of the content.

Now the question is, the content of laborers around the world? Not really. As it is now, Google is based in large measure - even if they vehemently deny - in their own metrics PageRank, or PR and age of the domain. Ancient sites have been (and still is) after hundreds of links to your pages a week without Ding in the search results. This is a new field could not and still can not do, or will go to the sandbox (though not really as bad as it sounds).

So what does Google do? They decided that rather than changing the rules for older sites vs. the new sites, they would change the way they read and quality content, giving a more even playing field in the long term. The person gets better content recognition sites that are simply copying and pasting considered undesirable, but the sites of authority and old fields still have the advantage - they just need to give some decent content for a change.

Now it was a side effect of an update to Google Panda article sites have been hit and hit hard. In particular, EzineArticles and Articlebase, who saw their rankings of research to take away a huge smack in the Panda. New Google algorithm to maintain the content on these sites on farms. But who writes articles to understand that these sites are not content areas. These sites are groups of people to read, modify and approve the articles on these sites, there is no overlap of content and the quality is high. Why did you hit?

Well, even if these sites are not (yet) the exploitation of content, take an incredible amount of energy as important areas. At the top of search engine optimization in Panda Google Updater could not choose a keyword (almost every word you can think of) to write an article for optimum, published on the article high level and get on the first page of Google within 3 days. No joke. It took almost no effort to get this high in the SERPs - these sites have become so powerful that they have completely dominated the search results. It is rare to find a niche keywords in an article directory or page eHow was not in the top 10.

Such was the success of the panda from these sources? Yes and No. Yes, because it was so easy to get good rankings and results of the separate elements, not because some articles were written and probably earned the grade they had achieved.

Although the article directories would have taken a successful unfair, one thing is certain, How deserved the spot. How was and is a strong content. Most of their articles are just empty rooms, written quickly and without much care, and is loaded completely full to the brim with ads. But after the dust Panda, I still eHow results in the top 10 for nearly 50% of the keywords I am a researcher. Why? EHow has found a way to beat the system or Panda have their content has improved. Something tells me it is not the last.

The truth is that when the first shot and a lot of dust settled, most of my sites are doing much better than they ever were before the update to Google Panda. Some of them have improved a lot better than I expected, but that is not really a surprise for me. What Google did not panda to get rid of the junk in their SERPs, and reward good linking structure and content.

Does anyone know a good search engine optimization based on page and off page SEO and the importance of content and links to bring in a solid. Do not pay for links, no spam, not the content of cultivation, are all things that people knew that they should not do, but will in any case, and why? For some time it worked. But, as we will update all before, Panda was there to close the advantage, Ding black hats, white hats and the reward.

SEO DELHI is a media company specializing in developing custom websites and search engines optimization.


Post a Comment

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More